Technical perspective: By the end of the decade, we will deliver universal, fully fault-tolerant quantum computing
By Dr. Harry Buhrman, Chief Scientist for Algorithms and Innovation, and Dr. Chris Langer, Fellow
This week, we confirm what has been implied by the rapid pace of our recent technical progress as we reveal a major acceleration in our hardware road map. By the end of the decade, our accelerated hardware roadmap will deliver a fully fault-tolerant and universal quantum computer capable of executing millions of operations on hundreds of logical qubits.
The next major milestone on our accelerated roadmap is ҹɫֱ Helios™, Powered by Honeywell, a device that will definitively push beyond classical capabilities in 2025. That sets us on a path to our fifth-generation system, ҹɫֱ Apollo™, a machine that delivers scientific advantage and a commercial tipping point this decade.
What is Apollo?
We are committed to continually advancing the capabilities of our hardware over prior generations, and Apollo makes good on that promise. It will offer:
- thousands of physical qubits
- physical error rates less than 10-4
- All of our most competitive features: all-to-all connectivity, low crosstalk, mid-circuit measurement and qubit re-use
- Conditional logic
- Real-time classical co-compute
- Physical variable angle 1 qubit and 2 qubit gates
- Hundreds of logical qubits
- Logical error rates better than 10-6 with analysis based on recent literature estimating as low as 10-10
By leveraging our all-to-all connectivity and low error rates, we expect to enjoy significant efficiency gains in terms of fault-tolerance, including single-shot error correction (which saves time) and high-rate and high-distance Quantum Error Correction (QEC) codes (which mean more logical qubits, with stronger error correction capabilities, can be made from a smaller number of physical qubits).
Studies of several efficient QEC codes already suggest we can enjoy logical error rates much lower than our target 10-6 – we may even be able to reach 10-10, which enables exploration of even more complex problems of both industrial and scientific interest.
Error correcting code exploration is only just beginning – we anticipate discoveries of even more efficient codes. As new codes are developed, Apollo will be able to accommodate them, thanks to our flexible high-fidelity architecture. The bottom line is that Apollo promises fault-tolerant quantum advantage sooner, with fewer resources.
Like all our computers, Apollo is based on the . Here, each qubit’s information is stored in the atomic states of a single ion. Laser beams are applied to the qubits to perform operations such as gates, initialization, and measurement. The lasers are applied to individual qubits or co-located qubit pairs in dedicated operation zones. Qubits are held in place using electromagnetic fields generated by our ion trap chip. We move the qubits around in space by dynamically changing the voltages applied to the chip. Through an alternating sequence of qubit rearrangements via movement followed by quantum operations, arbitrary circuits with arbitrary connectivity can be executed.
The ion trap chip in Apollo will host a 2D array of trapping locations. It will be fabricated using standard CMOS processing technology and controlled using standard CMOS electronics. The 2D grid architecture enables fast and scalable qubit rearrangement and quantum operations – a critical competitive advantage. The Apollo architecture is scalable to the significantly larger systems we plan to deliver in the next decade.
What is Apollo good for?
Apollo’s scaling of very stable physical qubits and native high-fidelity gates, together with our advanced error correcting and fault tolerant techniques will establish a quantum computer that can perform tasks that do not run (efficiently) on any classical computer. We already had a first glimpse of this in our recent work on H2, where we performed 100x better than competitors who performed the same task while using 30,000x less power than a classical supercomputer. But with Apollo we will travel into uncharted territory.
The flexibility to use either thousands of qubits for shorter computations (up to 10k gates) or hundreds of qubits for longer computations (from 1 million to 1 billion gates) make Apollo a versatile machine with unprecedented quantum computational power. We expect the first application areas will be in scientific discovery; particularly the simulation of quantum systems. While this may sound academic, this is how all new material discovery begins and its value should not be understated. This era will lead to discoveries in materials science, high-temperature superconductivity, complex magnetic systems, phase transitions, and high energy physics, among other things.
In general, Apollo will advance the field of physics to new heights while we start to see the first glimmers of distinct progress in chemistry and biology. For some of these applications, users will employ Apollo in a mode where it offers thousands of qubits for relatively short computations; e.g. exploring the magnetism of materials. At other times, users may want to employ significantly longer computations for applications like chemistry or topological data analysis.
But there is more on the horizon. Carefully crafted AI models that interact seamlessly with Apollo will be able to squeeze all the “quantum juice” out and generate data that was hitherto unavailable to mankind. We anticipate using this data to further the field of AI itself, as it can be used as training data.
The era of scientific (quantum) discovery and exploration will inevitably lead to commercial value. Apollo will be the centerpiece of this commercial tipping point where use-cases will build on the value of scientific discovery and support highly innovative commercially viable products.
Very interestingly, we will uncover applications that we are currently unaware of. As is always the case with disruptive new technology, Apollo will run currently unknown use-cases and applications that will make perfect sense once we see them. We are eager to co-develop these with our customers in our unique co-creation program.
How do we get there?
Today, System Model H2 is our most advanced commercial quantum computer, providing 56 physical qubits with physical two-qubit gate errors less than 10-3. System Model H2, like all our systems, is based on the QCCD architecture.
Starting from where we are today, our roadmap progresses through two additional machines prior to Apollo. The ҹɫֱ Helios™ system, which we are releasing in 2025, will offer around 100 physical qubits with two-qubit gate errors less than 5x10-4. In addition to expanded qubit count and better errors, Helios makes two departures from H2. First, Helios will use 137Ba+ qubits in contrast to the 171Yb+ qubits used in our H1 and H2 systems. This change enables lower two-qubit gate errors and less complex laser systems with lower cost. Second, for the first time in a commercial system, Helios will use . The result will be a “twice-as-good" system: Helios will offer roughly 2x more qubits with 2x lower two-qubit gate errors while operating more than 2x faster than our 56-qubit H2 system.
After Helios we will introduce ҹɫֱ Sol™, our first commercially available 2D-grid-based quantum computer. Sol will offer hundreds of physical qubits with two-qubit gate errors less than 2x10-4, operating approximately 2x faster than Helios. Sol being a fully 2D-grid architecture is the scalability launching point for the significant size increase planned for Apollo.
Opportunity for early value creation discovery in Helios and Sol
Thanks to Sol’s low error rates, users will be able to execute circuits with up to 10,000 quantum operations. The usefulness of Helios and Sol may be extended with a combination of quantum error detection (QED) and quantum error mitigation (QEM). For example, the [[k+2, k, 2]] iceberg code is a light-weight QED code that encodes k+2 physical qubits into k logical qubits and only uses an additional 2 ancilla qubits. This low-overhead code is well-suited for Helios and Sol because it offers the non-Clifford variable angle entangling ZZ-gate directly without the overhead of magic state distillation. The errors Iceberg fails to detect are already ~10x lower than our physical errors, and by applying a modest run-time overhead to discard detected failures, the effective error in the computation can be further reduced. Combining QED with QEM, a ~10x reduction in the effective error may be possible while maintaining run-time overhead at modest levels and below that of full-blown QEC.
Why accelerate our roadmap now?
Our new roadmap is an acceleration over what we were previously planning. The benefits of this are obvious: Apollo brings the commercial tipping point sooner than we previously thought possible. This acceleration is made possible by a set of recent breakthroughs.
First, we solved the “wiring problem”: we demonstrated that trap chip control is scalable using our novel center-to-left-right (C2LR) protocol and broadcasting shared control signals to multiple electrodes. This demonstration of qubit rearrangement in a 2D geometry marks the most advanced ion trap built, containing approximately 40 junctions. This trap was deployed to 3 different testbeds in 2 different cities and operated with 2 different collections of dual-ion-species, and all 3 cases were a success. These demonstrations showed that the footprint of the most complex parts of the trap control stay constant as the number of qubits scales up. This gives us the confidence that Sol, with approximately 100 junctions, will be a success.
Second, we continue to reduce our two-qubit physical gate errors. Today, H1 and H2 have two-qubit gate errors less than 1x10-3 across all pairs of qubits. This is the best in the industry and is a key ingredient in our record >. Our systems are the most benchmarked in the industry, and we stand by our data - making it all . Recently, we observed an 8x10-4 two-qubit gate error in our Helios development test stand in 137Ba+, and we’ve seen even better error rates in other testbeds. We are well on the path to meeting the 5x10-4 spec in Helios next year.
Third, the all-to-all connectivity offered by our systems enables highly efficient QEC codes. , our H2 system with 56 physical qubits was used to generate 12 logical qubits at distance 4. This work demonstrated several experiments, including repeated rounds of error correction where the error in the final result was ~10x lower than the physical circuit baseline.
In conclusion, through a combination of advances in hardware readiness and QEC, we have line-of-sight to Apollo by the end of the decade, a fully fault-tolerant quantum advantaged machine. This will be a commercial tipping point: ushering in an era of scientific discovery in physics, materials, chemistry, and more. Along the way, users will have the opportunity to discover new enabling use cases through quantum error detection and mitigation in Helios and Sol.
ҹɫֱ has the best quantum computers today and is on the path to offering fault-tolerant useful quantum computation by the end of the decade.
About ҹɫֱ
ҹɫֱ, the world’s largest integrated quantum company, pioneers powerful quantum computers and advanced software solutions. ҹɫֱ’s technology drives breakthroughs in materials discovery, cybersecurity, and next-gen quantum AI. With over 500 employees, including 370+ scientists and engineers, ҹɫֱ leads the quantum computing revolution across continents.
The most common question in the public discourse around quantum computers has been, “When will they be useful?” We have an answer.
Very recently in Nature we a successful demonstration of a quantum computer generating certifiable randomness, a critical underpinning of our modern digital infrastructure. We explained how we will be taking a product to market this year, based on that advance – one that could only be achieved because we have the world’s most powerful quantum computer.
Today, we have made another huge leap in a different domain, providing fresh evidence that our quantum computers are the best in the world. In this case, we have shown that our quantum computers can be a useful tool for advancing scientific discovery.
Understanding magnetism
Our latest shows how our quantum computer rivals the best classical approaches in expanding our understanding of magnetism. This provides an entry point that could lead directly to innovations in fields from biochemistry, to defense, to new materials. These are tangible and meaningful advances that will deliver real world impact.
To achieve this, we partnered with researchers from Caltech, Fermioniq, EPFL, and the Technical University of Munich. The team used ҹɫֱ’s System Model H2 to simulate quantum magnetism at a scale and level of accuracy that pushes the boundaries of what we know to be possible.
As the authors of the paper state:
“We believe the quantum data provided by System Model H2 should be regarded as complementary to classical numerical methods, and is arguably the most convincing standard to which they should be compared.”
Our computer simulated the quantum Ising model, a model for quantum magnetism that describes a set of magnets (physicists call them ‘spins’) on a lattice that can point up or down, and prefer to point the same way as their neighbors. The model is inherently “quantum” because the spins can move between up and down configurations by a process known as “quantum tunneling”.
Gaining material insights
Researchers have struggled to simulate the dynamics of the Ising model at larger scales due to the enormous computational cost of doing so. Nobel laureate physicist Richard Feynman, who is widely considered to be the progenitor of quantum computing, once said, “.” When attempting to simulate quantum systems at comparable scales on classical computers, the computational demands can quickly become overwhelming. It is the inherent ‘quantumness’ of these problems that makes them so hard classically, and conversely, so well-suited for quantum computing.
These inherently quantum problems also lie at the heart of many complex and useful material properties. The quantum Ising model is an entry point to confront some of the deepest mysteries in the study of interacting quantum magnets. While rooted in fundamental physics, its relevance extends to wide-ranging commercial and defense applications, including medical test equipment, quantum sensors, and the study of exotic states of matter like superconductivity.
Instead of tailored demonstrations that claim ‘quantum advantage’ in contrived scenarios, our breakthroughs announced this week prove that we can tackle complex, meaningful scientific questions difficult for classical methods to address. In the work described in this paper, we have proved that quantum computing could be the gold standard for materials simulations. These developments are critical steps toward realizing the potential of quantum computers.
With only 56 qubits in our commercially available System Model H2, the most powerful quantum system in the world today, we are already testing the limits of classical methods, and in some cases, exceeding them. Later this year, we will introduce our massively more powerful 96-qubit Helios system - breaching the boundaries of what until recently was deemed possible.
The marriage of AI and quantum computing is going to have a widespread and meaningful impact in many aspects of our lives, combining the strengths of both fields to tackle complex problems.
Quantum and AI are the ideal partners. At ҹɫֱ, we are developing tools to accelerate AI with quantum computers, and quantum computers with AI. According to recent independent analysis, our quantum computers are the world’s most powerful, enabling state-of-the-art approaches like Generative Quantum AI (Gen QAI), where we train classical AI models with data generated from a quantum computer.
We harness AI methods to accelerate the development and performance of our full quantum computing stack as opposed to simply theorizing from the sidelines. A paper in Nature Machine Intelligence reveals the results of a recent collaboration between ҹɫֱ and Google DeepMind to tackle the hard problem of quantum compilation.
The work shows a classical AI model supporting quantum computing by demonstrating its potential for quantum circuit optimization. An AI approach like this has the potential to lead to more effective control at the hardware level, to a richer suite of middleware tools for quantum circuit compilation, error mitigation and correction, even to novel high-level quantum software primitives and quantum algorithms.
An AI power-up for circuit optimization
The joint ҹɫֱ-Google DeepMind team of researchers tackled one of quantum computing’s most pressing challenges: minimizing the number of highly expensive but essential T-gates required for universal quantum computation. This is important specifically for the fault-tolerant regime, which is becoming increasingly relevant as quantum error correction protocols are being explored on rapidly developing quantum hardware. The joint team of researchers adapted AlphaTensor, Google DeepMind’s reinforcement learning AI system for algorithm discovery, which was introduced to improve the efficiency of linear algebra computations. The team introduced AlphaTensor-Quantum, which takes as input a quantum circuit and returns a new, more efficient one in terms of number of T-gates, with exactly the same functionality!
AlphaTensor-Quantum outperformed current state-of-the art optimization methods and matched the best human-designed solutions across multiple circuits in a thoroughly curated set of circuits, chosen for their prevalence in many applications, from quantum arithmetic to quantum chemistry. This breakthrough shows the potential for AI to automate the process of finding the most efficient quantum circuit. This is the first time that such an AI model has been put to the problem of T-count reduction at such a large scale.
A quantum power-up for machine learning
The symbiotic relationship between quantum and AI works both ways. When AI and quantum computing work together, quantum computers could dramatically accelerate machine learning algorithms, whether by the development and application of natively quantum algorithms, or by offering quantum-generated training data that can be used to train a classical AI model.
Our recent announcement about Generative Quantum AI (Gen QAI) spells out our commitment to unlocking the value of the data generated by our H2 quantum computer. This value arises from the world’s leading fidelity and computational power of our System Model H2, making it impossible to exactly simulate on any classical computer, and therefore the data it generates – that we can use to train AI – is inaccessible by any other means. ҹɫֱ’s Chief Scientist for Algorithms and Innovation, Prof. Harry Buhrman, has likened accessing the first truly quantum-generated training data to the invention of the modern microscope in the seventeenth century, which revealed an entirely new world of tiny organisms thriving unseen within a single drop of water.
Recently, we announced a wide-ranging partnership with NVIDIA. It charts a course to commercial scale applications arising from the partnership between high-performance classical computers, powerful AI systems, and quantum computers that breach the boundaries of what previously could and could not be done. Our President & CEO, Dr. Raj Hazra spoke to CNBC recently about our partnership. Watch the video here.
As we prepare for the next stage of quantum processor development, with the launch of our Helios system in 2025, we’re excited to see how AI can help write more efficient code for quantum computers – and how our quantum processors, the most powerful in the world, can provide a backend for AI computations.
As in any truly symbiotic relationship, the addition of AI to quantum computing equally benefits both sides of the equation.
To read more about ҹɫֱ and Google DeepMind’s collaboration, please read the scientific paper .
Few things are more important to the smooth functioning of our digital economies than trustworthy security. From finance to healthcare, from government to defense, quantum computers provide a means of building trust in a secure future.
ҹɫֱ and its partners JPMorganChase, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory and the University of Texas used quantum computers to solve a known industry challenge, generating the “random seeds” that are essential for the cryptography behind all types of secure communication. As our partner and collaborator, JPMorganChase explain in this that true randomness is a scarce and valuable commodity.
This year, ҹɫֱ will introduce a new product based on this development that has long been anticipated, but until now thought to be some years away from reality.
It represents a major milestone for quantum computing that will reshape commercial technology and cybersecurity: Solving a critical industry challenge by successfully generating certifiable randomness.
Building on the extraordinary computational capabilities of ҹɫֱ’s H2 System – the highest-performing quantum computer in the world – our team has implemented a groundbreaking approach that is ready-made for industrial adoption. of a proof of concept with JPMorganChase, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory, and the University of Texas alongside ҹɫֱ. It lays out a new quantum path to enhanced security that can provide early benefits for applications in cryptography, fairness, and privacy.
By harnessing the powerful properties of quantum mechanics, we’ve shown how to generate the truly random seeds critical to secure electronic communication, establishing a practical use-case that was unattainable before the fidelity and scalability of the H2 quantum computer made it reliable. So reliable, in fact, that it is now possible to turn this into a commercial product.
ҹɫֱ will integrate quantum-generated certifiable randomness into our commercial portfolio later this year. Alongside Generative Quantum AI and our upcoming Helios system – capable of tackling problems a trillion times more computationally complex than H2 – ҹɫֱ is further cementing its leadership in the rapidly-advancing quantum computing industry.
This Matters Because Cybersecurity Matters
Cryptographic security, a bedrock of the modern economy, relies on two essential ingredients: standardized algorithms and reliable sources of randomness – the stronger the better. Non-deterministic physical processes, such as those governed by quantum mechanics, are ideal sources of randomness, offering near-total unpredictability and therefore, the highest cryptographic protection. Google, when it originally announced , speculated on the possibility of using the random circuit sampling (RCS) protocol for the commercial production of certifiable random numbers. RCS has been used ever since to demonstrate the performance of quantum computers, including a milestone achievement in June 2024 by ҹɫֱ and JPMorganChase, demonstrating their first quantum computer to defy classical simulation. More recently RCS was used again by Google for the launch of its Willow processor.
In today’s , our joint team used the world’s highest-performing quantum and classical computers to generate certified randomness via RCS. The work was based on advanced research by Shih-Han Hung and Scott Aaronson of the University of Texas at Austin, who are co-authors on today’s paper.
Following a string of major advances in 2024 – solving the scaling challenge, breaking new records for reliability in partnership with Microsoft, and unveiling a hardware roadmap, today proves how quantum technology is capable of creating tangible business value beyond what is available with classical supercomputers alone.
What follows is intended as a non-technical explainer of the results in today’s Nature paper.
Certified Randomness: The First Commercial Application for Quantum Computers
For security sensitive applications, classical random number generation is unsuitable because it is not fundamentally random and there is a risk it can be “cracked”. The holy grail is randomness whose source is truly unpredictable, and Nature provides just the solution: quantum mechanics. Randomness is built into the bones of quantum mechanics, where determinism is thrown out the door and outcomes can be true coin flips.
At ҹɫֱ, we have a strong track record in developing methods for generating certifiable randomness using a quantum computer. In 2021, we introduced Quantum Origin to the market, as a quantum-generated source of entropy targeted at hardening classically-generated encryption keys, using well known quantum technologies that prior to that it had not been possible to use.
In their theory paper, , Hung and Aaronson ask the question: is it possible to repurpose RCS, and use it to build an application that moves beyond quantum technologies and takes advantage of the power of a quantum computer running quantum circuits?
This was the inspiration for the collaboration team led by JPMorganChase and ҹɫֱ to draw up plans to execute the proposal using real-world technology. Here’s how it worked:
- The team sent random circuits to ҹɫֱ’s H2, the world’s highest performing commercially available quantum computer.
- The quantum computer executed each circuit and returned the corresponding sample. The response times were remarkably short, and it could be proven that the circuits could not have been simulated classically within those times, even using the best-known techniques on computing resources greater than those available in the world’s most powerful classical supercomputer.
- The randomness of the returned sample was mathematically certified using Frontier, the world’s most powerful classical supercomputer, establishing it achieved a “passing threshold” on a measure known as the “cross-entropy benchmark”. The better your quantum computer, the higher you can set the “passing threshold”. When the threshold is sufficiently high, "spoofing" the cross-entropy benchmark using only classical methods becomes inefficient.
- Therefore, if the samples are returned quickly and meet the high threshold, the team could be confident that they were generated by a quantum computer – and thus be truly random.
This confirmed that ҹɫֱ’s quantum computer is not only incapable of being matched by classical computers but can also be used reliably to produce a certifiably random seed from a quantum computer without the need to build your own device, or even trust the device you are accessing.
Looking ahead
The use of randomness in critical cybersecurity environments will gravitate towards quantum resources, as the security demands of end users grows in the face of ongoing cyber threats.
The era of quantum utility offers the promise of radical new approaches to solving substantial and hard problems for businesses and governments.
ҹɫֱ’s H2 has now demonstrated practical value for cybersecurity vendors and customers alike, where non-deterministic sources of encryption may in time be overtaken by nature’s own source of randomness.
In 2025, we will launch our Helios device, capable of supporting at least 50 high-fidelity logical qubits – and further extending our lead in the quantum computing sector. We thus continue our track record of disclosing our objectives and then meeting or surpassing them. This commitment is essential, as it generates faith and conviction among our partners and collaborators, that empirical results such as those reported today can lead to successful commercial applications.
Helios, which is already in its late testing phase, ahead of being commercially available later this year, brings higher fidelity, greater scale, and greater reliability. It promises to bring a wider set of hybrid quantum-supercomputing opportunities to our customers – making quantum computing more valuable and more accessible than ever before.
And in 2025 we look forward to adding yet another product, building out our cybersecurity portfolio with a quantum source of certifiably random seeds for a wide range of customers who require this foundational element to protect their businesses and organizations.